Via Portland Press Herald: http://www.pressherald.com/2016/09/18/our-view-puc-solar-proposal-wrong-policy-process/

Earlier this year, a stakeholders group showed Maine how government is supposed to work.

Tasked with finding a fair way to expand the state’s solar energy portfolio, representatives of interests that did not agree on much hammered out a compromise plan that would expand capacity while sharing the benefits among all ratepayers. Their ideas were drafted into a bill, and it passed both houses of the Legislature with strong bipartisan support.

Then Gov. LePage and his allies in the Maine House of Representatives showed us how – all too often – government really does work. LePage vetoed the bill, and House Republican leaders made sure that it fell two votes short of the two-thirds required to override, dumping a year’s work out the window.

Now we are seeing the consequences of that vote. The Maine Public Utilities Commission, made up of three LePage appointees, is proposing the phase-outof net energy billing, also known as net metering, the one program Maine has to encourage solar investment.

WRONG DIRECTION

This is the wrong policy. It creates uncertainty for investors that would kill jobs in the solar industry, a rare bright spot in the Maine economy because of its potential for growth. Slowing solar expansion also means that the dirtiest electric plants will continue to come online in the summer to meet peak demand, contributing to air pollution and the greenhouse gas emissions that are changing the climate.

But not only is this the wrong policy, it’s also the wrong process.

More at: http://www.pressherald.com/2016/09/18/our-view-puc-solar-proposal-wrong-policy-process/

Maine PUC’s Misguided Ruling Roll Back Net Metering

UPDATED: 2/13/2017 based on final ruling

Maine’s Public Utilities Commission has completed its so-called ‘review’ of net metering and proposed the following:

• Existing net metering customers to be grandfathered 15 years
• New net metering customers (after rules take effect in 2018) to have new net metering customers enroll under a declining % of the T&D portion of their bill
• Creates new production tax “behind the meter” solar production!!!
• Omits some measures solar advocates supported in the draft ruling, such as:
  • Increasing max size of net metered projects from 660kw to 1,000kw
  • Eliminating cap on community solar membership
  • Instead, the proposal will effectively continue to chill growth of community solar farms

Our Take

Even with the benefit of several months to reconsider their initial ruling, the PUC has decided to issue an un-implementable, ‘judgment with no trial’ indictment of solar that ignores their own data showing that solar adds tremendous value to the grid and that utility customers should be able to benefit from this value. The relatively short period of time for grandfathering – 15 years – is/was the worst in the nation (worse even than Nevada, who after initially suspending net metering for all customers, restored it for 20 years).

Worse yet, deeper reading into the rules reveals a controversial and likely illegal measure to start taxing solar production consumed ‘behind the meter.’

Currently, neither the grid nor the utility accounts see solar that gets consumed in real-time at a solar site. This makes sense; any solar production you consume at your own location is your own business, and not subject to oversight from the utility companies. Much like utilities do not get insight as to when you install or remove a hot tub, or electric heat, or upgrade your fridge, they have no right to know how the solar you install affects on-site production. Except, in the PUC rules this would be the case, and the PUC would have utilities start tracking how much total solar power is generated on site and starting to charge solar customers transmission & distribution rates for the power that gets consumed on site!

This new tax on solar would cause solar customers to start paying grid usage “tax” on the power they produce and consume without even using the grid.

The new rules make it clear that it’s Maine’s legislature that should be doing the important job of defining solar policy, and not the un-elected 3-person Public Utilities Commissioners.

What Does This Mean for Solar in Maine?

If the PUC’s rules prevail:

• If you already have solar net metering or start net metering in 2017 – You will be grandfathered in for 15 years.
• If you are a new solar customer (starting 2018 onward) – You will receive a smaller benefit for the Transmission & Delivery (T&D) part of your solar bill for the life of the system. The rules would have T&D benefits drop by 10% per year, each year, over 10 years, until the T&D portion of the benefit is 0. Importantly, the year that you sign up for net metering, you would be locked into the benefit in place at that time (e.g. your benefit does not decrease over time). While this does not significantly affect solar economics (since the efficiency and cost of panels will be decreasing over this time period) it still moves solar policy in the wrong direction.

Maine can, and should, do better with solar policy, and we will be working with our network of solar allies – politicians from all parties (and unaffiliated), business leaders, faith leaders, communities, environmental groups, institutions of education, solar customers, would-like-to-be solar customers, and all members of the public who want the strong benefits of solar for Maine to be realized.

What Can You Do Next?

Contact Your Legislators and Say YES to Solar

Talk to Your Legislators

The legislature is considering several solar policy bills this session (Spring 2017), which could reverse changes made by the PUC and hopefully improve things for solar. At this point, it is unclear which bill(s) will make it to the floor and whether we will want to support them.

We have fought tirelessly for comprehensive solar policy in Maine, failing in the last session to override the Governor’s veto by only 2 votes. We are confident that Maine’s Legislature can do the right thing for solar, and we will work to make the facts clear despite ongoing campaigns of misinformation and bullying on the side of anti-solar advocates.

Why Does Maine Need Solar?

Here are some solar facts we encourage you to share around!

1. Every year Mainers export $5 billion from the local economy to import fossil fuels from away. By investing in local solar infrastructure, we create good-paying jobs for Mainers, we keep our money in the local economy and we increase our energy security.
2. Maine is dead last in New England in terms of solar energy adoption, and we have the highest per capita fossil fuel consumption and carbon emissions in the region. We are the only state in New England without a strong solar policy to encourage investments. We need a pro-solar policy to unleash industry job creation–in Massachusetts, there are 10,000 solar industry workers compared to 300 in Maine.
3. The cost to install solar has dropped by more than 70% over the last 10 years, creating a practical investment opportunity for all Mainers who want to save money and protect Maine’s pristine natural environment. But Mainers are holding off on these investments due to lack of clear policy signals out of Augusta for the past six years.
4. Maine has an abundant solar resource that can be harnessed to save money and reduce pollution, producing both economic and environmental benefits for all Mainers.Every year Maine gets 30% more sunshine than Germany, a world leader in solar adoption–in fact, Maine’s annual solar generation potential is equal to Houston, TX, thanks to an abundance of cold, clear days which allow solar arrays to produce their peak harvest.
5. Solar in Maine means jobs and lower electricity rates for all utility ratepayers.

Sample Messaging

Despite direct orders from the legislature to develop a policy to accelerate distributed solar in Maine, the PUC is instead proposing to weaken solar net energy metering, which will slow the growth of solar in Maine. The PUC is also ignoring its own Value of Solar study which clearly shows that solar benefits all ratepayers, whether they have solar on their roof or not.

The proposal clearly advances the interests of utility shareholders rather than maximizing the ratepayer benefits of solar. Since the PUC has proven unable to put facts and data ahead of utility interests, I urge the legislature to fulfill its obligation to develop a solar policy that will accelerate distributed generation, create jobs for Mainers and produce financial savings for all ratepayers.

The Commission should be promoting new solar, like all of our neighboring states do.  Solar means new jobs for Maine, lower energy costs for Maine, and new economic opportunity.  It’s time for the LePage administration to either start leading or get out of the way.

LOOK UP YOUR STATE LEGISLATORS

LOOK UP CONTACT INFO FOR LOCAL PAPERS (LETTERS TO THE EDITOR)